Show Webcam de una rubia tetudísima

Show webcam de una preciosa rubia con un par de tetas alucinantes. Le gusta prepararse y ponerse guapa antes de empezar el show, se pinta los labios sensualmente para luego mostrarnos su espectacular cuerpo. Si bien las tetas son siliconadas, las tiene bien puestas ahí arriba que no hay quién las mueva.

3 Comentarios

Comentarios


  1. luis

    algo bien tu video

  2. Venkat

    the bears like them. Suddenly, getting out to LTWC was #1 pritoiry. Gorgeous day! I boil and peel the yams before freezing. Cheryl will bake and freeze without peeling. Did not see the bobcats; it was their naptime. I will say their cage is not as dirty as it looks on camera! I shadowed Cheryl while she fed a sick coyote, then snowshoe rabbits with furry feet, then other rabbits, and squirrels. I found out what the bobcats eat, but will not say it here. It is protein, OK? Found out the bear weighs 10 pounds. I went clear in the bobcat cage with everything he needs right there pool, grapes, the big purple teddy bear cool and shadowy, peaceful even. I walked clear around behind the slanting log and looked up. He was snuggled in the little box up there, sitting on towels. Even if my camera had not broken, I could not have taken much of a picture. I think he was awake, listening when I said hello and I love you. I sent him a lot of love and left quietly. Cheryl says he is pretty low right now, losing his mom and so many changes, still figuring out that we aren’t going to hurt him. Oh, and they’re expecting a river otter later today! All she rote!

  3. Ricardo

    Look, webcams aren’t the real issue here. They’re just cotpumer peripherals, like speakers or keyboards. To say that webcams are unsafe because they can be remotely viewed is like saying cotpumer mice are dangerous because you might delete your own files with it. How hackers become “webcam spies” is largely an issue of personal cotpumer and network security, to which the majority of users are incredibly negligent.Before we go any further, you have to realize that the only way your webcam can be accessed from an “offshore” intruder is through something called a remote desktop connection. When someone has this sort of access to your machine, they can do far more malicious things than access your webcam, and chances are they have a much more sinister agenda than spying on you. Think about it: what does a hacker, who is probably hundreds of miles away, want with your picture or video feed when they can steal your credit card numbers? Of course, there are exceptions, but there are far more hackers interested in your wallet than your picture. Furthermore, this type of attack is glaringly obvious. Services and programs will start and stop at random, the victim’s mouse may appear to move autonomously, and files and folders will appear and disappear. Because of this, it isn’t viable for a hacker to remain remotely connected to your system through the internet for extended periods of time. This type of attack is far more common in a local setting, such as over a wireless network. We see it in movies or TV all the time, some guy in the van outside the bank or museum can hack into the security system and view the video feeds. In all honesty, it’s really not that hard to break into run-of-the-mill wireless networks operated by homeowners and businesses, just like they do in the movies. For example, my home street back in Robinson Township had ten houses on it in addition to my own. To collect data for a research paper on wireless security in my senior year of high school, I asked for permission of my neighbors to test the security of their wireless networks. Out of those ten networks, seven of them were “protected”, meaning they did indeed have a password. Out of those next seven, two used the default passwords for their specific access points (routers), which can be looked up online. Four others had Verizon-generated WEP keys, which can be cracked by running the network name of random numbers and letters through an algorithm freely available online. These first nine networks were taken down within seconds, but the last household had a lock known as a WPA-PSK2 key. These are far more difficult to break through, but I was able to crack it after a few hours of capturing packets via a three-way handshake and running those packets through a Linux utility called aircrack-ng. After joining the network, it’s possible for an infiltrator to control everything from your cotpumer to FIOS set-top boxes. After reporting these results to all my neighbors, my street has arguably the most secure home networks in the neighborhood.As you can see, wireless network security is pretty much a total sham unless you’re a large institution such as a school or business that can afford to have monitored security. The true security comes from checking up on how well secured your systems are, which the majority of users never do. Honestly, the amount of negligence present in cotpumer security for the basic user approaches total ignorance. Would you leave your front door unlocked with all your most prized possessions behind it? Of course you wouldn’t. Then why is it that people do it with their cotpumer systems? It just doesn’t make any sense to me. I know some people just “don’t have the time” to read up on cotpumer security, but they sure have time to install locks on all their doors or install pricey security systems to protect their homes. If average users took any initiative at all to protect themselves, I doubt we’d even have the issue of webcam spies.